Ask a Christian philosopher a question
- Thread starter anonymous person
- Start date
I am a Christian apologist and that is one of my roles here.
Is that a bad thing? If so, why?
Upvote
0
First, as you already know, apologetics is not permitted here, as per the forum's Statement of Purpose. Second, the thread title should be changed to reflect your participation as an apologist.
Upvote
0
First, if you think I have broken any rule, notify the proper person and let them make a decision.
Second, do not accuse me of ignoring you or being evasive if you ask me a question which the rules do not allow for me to answer.
Fair enough?
Upvote
0
To the best of my understanding, the rules allow you to answer the questions I have posed, so you cannot rely on that as an excuse.
Strict enforcement of the rules would severely limit your apologetic activities, which would certainly be inconvenient for you.
Upvote
0
In addition, recognize too that the door swings both ways. Atheist apologists are also prohibited from engaging in apologetics here.
If your intent here is to all of a sudden be a forum monitor, make sure you are impartial.
If your intent here is to all of a sudden be a forum monitor, make sure you are impartial.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Ana the Ist
Aggressively serene!
Well modern research has consistently shown this over and over again. The reasons why are various...but well documented. The science is there if you're interested...if it's too much work for you, I'll even link you some materials.
It's unfortunate that a lot of the time, in researching history, eyewitness accounts are all we have. It's even less fortunate when we don't even have eyewitness accounts...such as in the case of Jesus. That's why I was asking if there was anything else you'd consider "good evidence"?
Upvote
0
Archaeopteryx our forum monitor will have to approve that this post is not apologetic in nature before I respond to it. Then i will have to submit my response to him for review before he authorizes me to post it. I do not want to break any rules.
So maybe one day you will receive my reply.
Upvote
0
In the meantime, you should be able to read the entire work edited by Thomas Morris entitled: God and the Philosophers.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
bhsmte
Newbie
I have made great effort to analyze the veracity of the claims in the NT specifically, as I have explained many times on these threads. In fact, this effort, is one of the reasons I am no longer a Christian.
So, it is clear, you either have not paid attention to my posts or you are asking the wrong question, because I have addressed the question numerous times, with explaining how I went about determining the credibility of NT claims.
Upvote
0
bhsmte
Newbie
An affidavit would be considered by a court of law, but would not carry the same weight as an eye witness appearing in person and being subjected to cross examination.
You do realize, some eye witnesses are simply wrong in what they claim they saw and some simply lie. Or, is this not a possibility to you?
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
bhsmte
Newbie
Clearly, you have not followed along in this thread, and seen what Chrillman has posted.
He essentially said, no one could teach him anything about logic, so I made an obvious statement based on Chrillman's posts, that anyone trying to help him with logical thinking, had the chips stacked against them.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
