It's at least interesting that people from other nations spend so much time slandering political figures in the USA, whereas Americans overwhelmingly think that who is chosen to govern in those countries is the business of the voters who live there.
I figured that would be the answer, but I still think that 1) those who are not voters on our elections should draw back from talking like they are directly involved, and 2) those whose information comes only from long distance ought to recognize the limitations of their information.Probably because American politics tends to land quite heavily on other nations. .
I figured that would be the answer, but I still think that 1) those who are not voters on our elections should draw back from talking like they are directly involved, and 2) those whose information comes only from long distance ought to recognize the limitations of their information.
It's actually somewhat embarrassing for us to read the belligerent posts of people living nowhere near the USA who spout off on something they know little about. I guess we expect somewhat better manners, if nothing else.
I feel so sorry for you to have to endure that. When the day comes that the Australian Broadcasting System is the leading provider of news for the whole world, just imagine the fun we Americans will have finding ourselves to have become instant experts on all things relating to Australian politics.Yeah...not gonna happen.
The World is bombarded by US-driven media, so if it's on the news it's in the mind..
I feel so sorry for you to have to endure that. When the day comes that the Australian Broadcasting System is the leading provider of news for the whole world, just imagine the fun we Americans will have finding ourselves to have become instant experts on all things relating to Australian politics.
Let's test out that theory. When is the last time you read any post on CF from an American that commented in any way on the outcome of national elections in Australia?
Albion, I get my News coverage from Al Jazeera and from Google. (I really think Al Jazeera an BBC have the best news coverage by far.) Whatever they cover I pay attention to. Apparently Australia isn't experiencing famine or Ebola or being attacked by ISIS or anything that would get it into the headlines. I know that there have been occasional Aussie stories. But generally speaking, we Americans generally think of Aussies as really good people who do things right and don't get into trouble and so don't end up on the front page.Let's test out that theory. When is the last time you read any post on CF from an American that commented in any way on the outcome of national elections in Australia?
Yeah...not gonna happen.
The World is bombarded by US-driven media, so if it's on the news it's in the mind.
Anyway- long distance information is becoming less and less of an issue in our globalized world.
I'm hoping I get a chance to vote for Bernie Sanders, btw.
Try being on the other end as well. There's a joke about Americans down here- they are always right when it comes to politics and religion- just ask them.
LOL. I know it's like, Al Jazeera, you gotta be kidding! But honestly it spends less time on Sports and Movie Star fluff, not so much local news, more international news. And it's sophisticated. Of course I felt dumb when there was a forest fire in my county and I was the only one in my circle of friends that didn't know about it LOL. I was suprised that two of my brothers also watch Al Jazeera (one liberal and one conservative). Maybe it's a family trait. Maybe it's just a good station and we're smart.I thought you were kidding me when I first read that. But OK.
Apparently dual citizenship.
I am interested in what Bernie Sanders will prresent. Never have been a Hillary(ditz brain) fan, seems like mad cow disease.
Being 1/2 out of a depression era/WW II Jewish family, functioning community was very important. At the very same time period and even to present, community for the Lakota side of my family has remained vital for our survival, though the gov't. has sought to eradicate us.There is a g-d, now we have casinos.
Sane democratic socialism wouldn't bother me. Problem will be the financing.
I dealt with the pronunciation. It is meaningless.
Do you think he is limited by our understanding?
Do you think any Hebrew scholar could understand Moses if he appeared today?
We do the best we can and he honors that. What he does not honor is compromise with the world.
I think I asked you the exact same question, several times, and you just ignored it, so this is hilarious.
In fact I suggested that David might have a very different dialect / accent than Moses, even, and you just ignored it every time I brought it up !
How can we condemn these blessings on a man?
Meaningless.
In twelve tribes over a thousand years, how many different pronunciations do you think they had for YHWH?
If you brought up anything like this to me, it must have been over something other than pronunciation.
I have a preferred pronunciation, but I have never said it was the only one, or the only correct one.
If even today, we can't all agree on the pronunciation of pecan, tomato, etc. how will we agree on something that many
have an aversion to speaking in the first place?
Being he's a Rabbi I would say the problem isn't his.The Messianic Rabbi said here:
"The only two nations that have ever been in a relationship with God is Israel and the United States" !
Sure this person is not a Latter Day Saint ?
I disagree with the manner in which he pronounced YHWH, but I do not mind the name being spoken in and of itself.
But the problem here is the CONTEXT in which this holy name and blessing is spoken, and the person over whom it is spoken.
Being he's a Rabbi I would say the problem isn't his.