Boy Trained to Handle Hunting Rifle by Father Now in Trouble. Father Not

Should adults be held accountable for keeping firearms away from minors?

  • Yes

    Votes: 33 89.2%
  • No

    Votes: 4 10.8%

  • Total voters
    37

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,358
14,061
✟234,967.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Why? Most kids I know have their own guns by age 12.
And they're allowed to go off with them without adult supervision? Not cool, IMHO.

If you wouldn't let someone drive a car unsupervised, I think it's fair to say you shouldn't give them access to a loaded firearm unsupervised.
 
Upvote 0

SepiaAndDust

There's a FISH in the percolator
May 6, 2012
4,380
1,325
57
Mid-America
✟26,546.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
And they're allowed to go off with them without adult supervision? Not cool, IMHO.

If you wouldn't let someone drive a car unsupervised, I think it's fair to say you shouldn't give them access to a loaded firearm unsupervised.

Maybe, maybe not, but there's nothing currently illegal about teaching kids how to use a gun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,358
14,061
✟234,967.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Maybe, maybe not, but there's nothing currently illegal about teaching kids how to use a gun.
Of course not. I don't think anyone suggested there was, or should be, did they? I learned to shoot a .22 when I was about 9. But I was fully supervised while doing so, and the weapons were locked up and the ammunition stored separately afterwards.
 
Upvote 0

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,358
14,061
✟234,967.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
That's how I read the thread title. Maybe I was mistaken.
Well, maybe I was, too. But like I say, it's the leaving the firearm and ammunition unsecured I think is culpable, not the training.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tallguy88
Upvote 0

Crowns&Laurels

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
2,769
751
✟6,832.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Why would the boy's father be charged with anything?

Exactly.
Are we at the point now where we're scathing parents for teaching their children how to use a rifle?

I learned to use a rifle, a shotgun, and a magnum before I was thirteen years old. We used to shoot them off in the woods for fun and go hunting.
This is something that people have done since guns were first invented. It's not those type of people that are the one's who are crazy, it's those shunning it now that are.

There's no justification to charge the father with anything. The child will get 'juvenile life' and be out before he is 21- they aren't going to try a 5th grader as an adult.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟960,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
If this boy had bullied this little girl before as is reported he should probably be put to death when he reaches 18. This was as malicious a crime as I have ever heard of. There is no hope of rehabilitation of a person so evil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

Crowns&Laurels

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
2,769
751
✟6,832.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
If this boy had bullied this little girl before as is reported he should probably be put to death when he reaches 18. This was as malicious a crime as I have ever heard of. There is no hope of rehabilitation of a person so evil.

:doh:Are you serious?
He's a fifth grade kid. If he were just several years younger, they wouldn't even be able to charge him with anything.

What this is, is a case of a confused, angry child who has yet to know the consequences of such actions. This is exactly why we do not treat people that young as we do adults for crimes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Armoured
Upvote 0

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Site Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Exactly.
Are we at the point now where we're scathing parents for teaching their children how to use a rifle?

I learned to use a rifle, a shotgun, and a magnum before I was thirteen years old. We used to shoot them off in the woods for fun and go hunting.
This is something that people have done since guns were first invented. It's not those type of people that are the one's who are crazy, it's those shunning it now that are.

There's no justification to charge the father with anything. The child will get 'juvenile life' and be out before he is 21- they aren't going to try a 5th grader as an adult.

A firearm is a deadly instrument, potentially. If I, as a parent, do not take reasonable precautions, then I should have some accountability for neglecting to take reasonable care. The parent did not err in teaching his son about using a firearm. He erred in not keeping the weapon properly secured. An 11-year-old is not an adult and cannot be expected to act like one. Telling little Johnny "not to touch the gun if I'm not there" is insufficient.

Just because I didn't mean for my kid to do something bad with my gun doesn't relieve me of the burden of accountability for what I had control over.
 
Upvote 0

Crowns&Laurels

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
2,769
751
✟6,832.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
A firearm is a deadly instrument, potentially. If I, as a parent, do not take reasonable precautions, then I should have some accountability for neglecting to take reasonable care. The parent did not err in teaching his son about using a firearm. He erred in not keeping the weapon properly secured. An 11-year-old is not an adult and cannot be expected to act like one. Telling little Johnny "not to touch the gun if I'm not there" is insufficient.

Just because I didn't mean for my kid to do something bad with my gun doesn't relieve me of the burden of accountability for what I had control over.

But then lets suppose a child finds a way to obtain the firearm nonetheless. Or lets say a parent leaves a gun unattended while he goes outside, to return and see it missing.
You can't police such things and expect that the parent should pay, which would be pushed if we got to some point where the parent has to be legally inquired upon on such.
Isn't it punishment enough that the parent has to live with what happened?

There is such a thing as tragedy in which blame can only go but so far.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟960,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
:doh:Are you serious?
He's a fifth grade kid. If he were just several years younger, they wouldn't even be able to charge him with anything.

What this is, is a case of a confused, angry child who has yet to know the consequences of such actions. This is exactly why we do not treat people that young as we do adults for crimes.

If this kid has killed animals with a gun he knew exactly what the consequences of his actions would be. What he didn't know was the broader tragedy he would cause by this action, but this is also characteristic of adult actions as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,370
8,314
Visit site
✟281,429.00
Faith
Atheist
:doh:Are you serious?
He's a fifth grade kid. If he were just several years younger, they wouldn't even be able to charge him with anything.

What this is, is a case of a confused, angry child who has yet to know the consequences of such actions. This is exactly why we do not treat people that young as we do adults for crimes.

Unless they've actually committed no crime, but waving a gun which looked real on a playground, in which case, we simply have the police roll up and shoot them without warning. RIP Tamir Rice.
 
Upvote 0

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Site Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
But then lets suppose a child finds a way to obtain the firearm nonetheless. Or lets say a parent leaves a gun unattended while he goes outside, to return and see it missing.
You can't police such things and expect that the parent should pay, which would be pushed if we got to some point where the parent has to be legally inquired upon on such.
Negligence remains negligence. The gun owner is responsible for securing it. Had it been reasonably secured, I would not hold the parent to blame as he would've been taking reasonable precaution.
Isn't it punishment enough that the parent has to live with what happened?
Which parent????????? The kid that pulled the trigger or the dead kid's parent?
There is such a thing as tragedy in which blame can only go but so far.
Interesting that such things are always "just a tragedy" and gun owners get a pass.
 
Upvote 0

Crowns&Laurels

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
2,769
751
✟6,832.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Interesting that such things are always "just a tragedy" and gun owners get a pass.

There was a kid who took a car out joyriding. Would you have blamed his guardian if he had steam rolled somebody?

Of course not, because a car isn't a gun, and the only reason you're even trying to have some loaded opinion on the matter is because it's gun related.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Site Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There was a kid who took a car out joyriding. Would you have blamed his guardian if he had steam rolled somebody?
Do you know who would've paid for the expenses incurred by the steamrollee? The vehicle owner. Basic liability. Do you know who is going to pay for the medical expense and burial of the dead girl? The dead girl's family.
Of course not, because a car isn't a gun, and the only reason you're even trying to have some loaded opinion on the matter is because it's gun related.
Simple culpability/accountability/responsibility. Gun owners get a free pass when their unsecured weapons are misused, resulting in injuries or death.
 
Upvote 0