- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,123
- 51,509
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
How much longer?
- Thread starter DDan
- Start date
- Status
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,123
- 51,509
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,123
- 51,509
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
None that I know of.
The laws were written to accommodate deep time.
Macroevolution is a violation of shallow time.
(Okay, I see the point being made. My bad.)
Upvote
0
You are the one who said that human heart valves are rejected by human patients because of genetic diversity. You tell me.
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,123
- 51,509
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Are you kidding?
If you had proof overturning evolution you would be rich. First, you would win the Nobel prize. That is something like 3/4 million US $ right there for personal use. Imagine what you would get from speaking fees? Heck Sarah Palin was making over $100,000/engagement at the height of her popularity, and you would be a way bigger celebrity than her. You would be regarded as one of the great scientists of this era. Then you would get funding from the Templeton Foundation and other religious based organizations. You wouldn't know what to do with all the money you would get.
All you have to do is show the TOE is incorrect. Simple right?
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,123
- 51,509
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Oh, please.
What's with the 20 questions?
Macroevolution can't be explained without deep time.
In fact, from Homo sapiens to SN1987A, this universe is portrayed on paper as a product of deep time.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,123
- 51,509
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
We're not like the cheetas, who are so genetically alike, yet teeter on the brink of extinction due to ... what's it called?
Inbreeding depression or something?
I don't know.
To be honest, I have no idea what I'm talking about.
Outside of the Bible, I'm like a fish out of water.
Upvote
0
JonFromMinnesota
Well-Known Member
Not only that but you would be described as an absolute hero in the scientific community
Upvote
0
Largely theocratic societies tend not to be open environments. For instance, in the USA there was a long time ban on doing Stem Cell research.
Upvote
0
Two humans share more DNA than a human and a pig, yet pig valves are less likely to be rejected by a human patient than a heart valve from another human.
I am talking about the fact that a pig heart valve has a lower chance of being rejected by a human patient than a human heart valve, or even a chimp heart valve.
Upvote
0
Microevolution is essentially "Natural Selection". Natural Selection doesn't violate anything.
A baby changing over it's lifespan is a natural occurrence. Natural processes with-in a system.
Creationists believe the genetic code is already in the animal for the variations to occur.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Macroevolution is just repeated rounds of natural selection over many generations.
So you are saying that a giraffe could give birth to a human?
Upvote
0
justlookinla
Regular Member
No sir. It's not natural selection creating new life forms.
A giraffe and a coconut was produced from the same life form by the same process? Where on earth did that idea come from?
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,123
- 51,509
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
JonFromMinnesota
Well-Known Member
Define "new life forms". If you're talking about species, then you're wrong. Natural selection does lead to new species. Are you suggesting that genetic mutations and natural selection stops happening at a certain point?
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
