...well didn't take the CTists long to start making claims about the latest atrocity.
You will find there are people in this world who hate America and American's. While America and American's who are under the "rule" of the current president and have to suffer for that and have every valid right to opine that condition are laughed at, dismissed, ridiculed, mocked, by those in the world who are also atheists and hate America and American's.I don't identify myself as a "Conspiracy Theorist". I am a Christian. Part of me being a Christian is being discerning of the truth. You're supposed to be a Christian remember? How about you actually watch the video and respond to it rather than just dismissing it as a conspiracy theory
I think it's the double standard fear paradigm card that causes the fear to call it what it is.Yet it's treasonous. BIG TIME, even if NO ONE has the guts to call it what it is.
Yes, indeed. And I fear it will only get worse.What a mess this country is in.
I think it's the double standard fear paradigm card that causes the fear to call it what it is.
Think about that article posted wherein 11 black women were removed from a train for disturbing the peace.
The argument is, they were removed because they were black. That sets the stage for the charge of racism against those that did the deed of removing the women due to complaints by staff and what had to be more than one passenger.
The counter to that of course is, should those 11 women have been allowed to disturb the peace of others simply because they were black?
With Obama when he provided aid to the American enemy Taliban by releasing five of their most highly trained leaders back to them, there are those who say that isn't Treason. And as yet he's not been prosecuted for Treason. And why is that? Because he didn't commit treason? No. Providing aid and comfort to the enemy of America is Treason.
He's not been prosecuted because it would look like it was a racist effort to remove the first black president from office. What is of course missed by those who think that is, if a black man wasn't wanted in the highest office, the American voters wouldn't have re-elected him. It wasn't his color that got him the office. It isn't his color that should take him out of the office.
But make it about race and those who are opposed to someone's wrong doing are then painted as racist. It isn't about race, it's about behavior, action under color of law in the case of Obama. But make it about race and all that gets swept under the rug of reason so that the dread R word takes precedent. And then people back off of their motivation for acting justly. Because they are afraid of being called by the dread R word.
It's the new weapon.
Yes, indeed. And I fear it will only get worse.
Yes, but you'll notice it is a practice oft published as a cause or excuse?Throwing "race" in there by anyone who would attempt to use it would be "weak", to say the least, and it's waaaay past being a credible thing to say.
In truth we're all opining about something we weren't there to witness first hand. The factors in play being wine, 11 loud rowdy women, and the rights of others. We'll see how it plays out. I personally hope their case is tossed simply because of the precedent it sets.And my friend, we disagree on the book club.
It's just wrong what happened to them.
I don't get the animosity towards them.
And for me, it has nothing to do with the color of their skin.
Anybody who attacks "LOL's" anything is just WRONG as far as i'm concerned.
I'm praying they win this case and the two who lost their jobs are offered awesome jobs that trumps their former ones.
You're welcome sister.You just reminded me to put them on my prayer wall in the hall.
Thank you my friend and brother in Christ.
I love wacky humor gifs for signatures. It lessens the tension that can arise in debates.And yer signatures still crack me up. Yer in HUGE competition with another member who has hilarious signatures.
There should be a contest.
Yes, but you'll notice it is a practice oft published as a cause or excuse?
In truth we're all opining about something we weren't there to witness first hand. The factors in play being wine, 11 loud rowdy women, and the rights of others. We'll see how it plays out. I personally hope their case is tossed simply because of the precedent it sets.
You're welcome sister.
I love wacky humor gifs for signatures. It lessens the tension that can arise in debates.
Not going to happen. The Law of the Land as defined in the US Constitution is that the Presidency of Barack Obama ends 20 January 2017 at 12:00 PM. Whether or not a state of emergency exists, or Martial Law, the Constitution remains the Law of the Land.Didn't ask you that.
Thank you.
That would be a first if Obama stayed in office, wouldn't it? And nobody would've expected it.
I s'pose there's a first time for everything though, right?
I guess it would've happened while we were all sleeping, so to speak.
Not going to happen. The Law of the Land as defined in the US Constitution is that the Presidency of Barack Obama ends 20 January 2017 at 12:00 PM. Whether or not a state of emergency exists, or Martial Law, the Constitution remains the Law of the Land.
The Military take an oath to support and defend the CONSTITUTION (not any president) against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Since Mr. Obama would according to the Constitution cease to be President on 20 January 2017 at 12:00 PM, any orders he would give after that time are illegal, and the service member is REQUIRED to disregard such orders.
Practically speaking, if a Presidential successor has not been determined by that time, the Speaker of the House would become the Acting President until such a successor was chosen.
In 1864 the US was in the midst of a bloody civil war, yet Lincoln for all of his faults and actions that were (and were ruled by SCOTUS) to be unconstitutional did not dare attempt to suspend or postpone the election. Until the fall of Atlanta, the outcome of that election was in doubt.I pray you are right.
Not going to happen. The Law of the Land as defined in the US Constitution is that the Presidency of Barack Obama ends 20 January 2017 at 12:00 PM. Whether or not a state of emergency exists, or Martial Law, the Constitution remains the Law of the Land.
The Military take an oath to support and defend the CONSTITUTION (not any president) against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Since Mr. Obama would according to the Constitution cease to be President on 20 January 2017 at 12:00 PM, any orders he would give after that time are illegal, and the service member is REQUIRED to disregard such orders.
Practically speaking, if a Presidential successor has not been determined by that time, the Speaker of the House would become the Acting President until such a successor was chosen.
The short answer is YES. He would be stopped. Yes Bush would have been stopped, and NO, the Military is not going to be doing anything to Americans except under the Insurrection and rebellion clause under the 14th Amendment.You have to ask yourself, If he tried would the people really be able to stop him?
I mean its hypothesized that Bush cheated the 2000 election, we couldn't stop him from being president.
We couldn't stop Bush from invading the Middle East.
We don't have say in a lot of things
The military has more power than the people ten times over, and they are trained not to think for themselves and take orders.
I hope they would be decent enough to protect their own people, but if a national attack is staged and putting us in "safety camps" is for "our own good" than who knows how many military would be opposed.
Millions of Nazi's ( The Military ) were willing to carry out Hitlers plans, who says our military isn't willing to carry out Obama's plans?
now could the OP point out where any of the claims made by the video poster can be supported from what he said? Even with the stutter effect the video poster seems very enamored with?While talking about the Oregon community college shooting in a press conference on Friday, President Obama talked about "crackpot conspiracy theories" that he is plotting to use "gun-safety measures" to "stay in power forever."
"If we're going to do something about that, the politics has to change," Obama said of more stringent gun control laws. "The politics has to change. And the people who are troubled by this have to be as intense and organized and as adamant about this issue as folks on the other side, who are absolutists and think that any gun-safety measures are somehow an assault on freedom or communistic, or a plot by me to take over and stay in power forever or something."
"I mean there are all kinds of crackpot conspiracy theories that float around," Obama joked. "Some of which, by the way, are ratified by elected officials in the other party on occasion. So we've got to change the politics of this."
You have to ask yourself, If he tried would the people really be able to stop him?
I mean its hypothesized that Bush cheated the 2000 election, we couldn't stop him from being president.
We couldn't stop Bush from invading the Middle East
We don't have say in a lot of things