This is arguable but I would say they have legal protection, but not job protection. As a federal employee I can tell you that you agree to choose to pursue the governments mandates over your religious predilections when you take the job. That's so they can fire you or you quit. They can't prosecute though due to 1st amendment. Stuff like this is the whole reason the military must retain the contientious objector status. They can't make you do things against your religion. People forget this nowadays.
2000 years later and he his words are still spoken. Was he silenced? Ummm...
When a majority of the country supports the legalization of murder, you will have a point.What do you mean "murder is bad", officer? That's a real antiquated view of morality.
You need to brush up on your governments.
There will come a day when all who refuse to acknowledge God's authority will scream, "Ive been burning alive for a thousand years and its just the beginning!"
That's horrible, but its reality.
there is a difference between illegal and immoral.So?
If what they are doing isn't illegal, then she has no right to tell them not to do it.
According to Liberty counsel the Kentucky oath of office includes supporting and defending religious values.
Neither. I live in the good ol' U.S. of A! Where people have the right to marry either a woman or a man if that's what makes them happy and no government employee can deny them this right that was settled upon by the highest court in all the land. I don't know if Russia or China grant people that level of freedom and I don't care because I don't live in either of those countries.so have you chosen Russia or China as your home of choice?
there is a difference between illegal and immoral.
and if she's a Christian, is in a position to have the approval over what they are asking,
then yes, she has a moral obligation to be sure that they are warned
that what they contemplate doing has eternal consequences.
look at it this way. If a highway worker knows that the bridge in the road ahead is unsafe to travel over,
isn't he obligated to warn any drivers of the danger ahead?
One of the benefits of being an elected official. In the private sector, you would be fired immediately.
In reality though, it just buys them time and her days are numbered.
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
What's the national motto of the United States again? I forgot.
Oh yeah!
Read his post again, you created a straw man.
It is deplorable remarks like that that give the Christians here insight as to why an atheist joins a Christians community.
America is finally moving away from that kind of religious dominance of Christianity in this country. And I think that it's about time. Now if we could just eliminate the rest of its religious exclusive influences in this country, like remove its marks from our national currency and out of the current pledge. We could then make all the religions equal in this country
no, all those Christians chose to ignore what makes a good husband or wife. or they were married to people who chose to ignore them.So all those Christians have chosen to ignore scripture on divorce and remarriage. So why should anyone pay attention whatsoever to any scripture? That's just cherry picking to suit all those divorced and remarried Christians.
You can move on all you like, but the hypocrisy written deep into those kind of statements is a very poor witness for Christ.
"According to [me]". LOL. Guess I wrote the Bible then.
The Declaration of Independence carries no legal weight in the US. It is a declaration of war. It is not a law that establishes or defines the country in any official capacity, nor does our awkward national motto."When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
What's the national motto of the United States again? I forgot.
Oh yeah!