That is a typical presumption!
No, the presumption is on your part. You presume because you cannot reconcile all of God's word, that there is a problem with God's word, rather than a problem with your own understanding.
Upvote
0
That is a typical presumption!
Why?
No, the presumption is on your part. You presume because you cannot reconcile all of God's word, that there is a problem with God's word, rather than a problem with your own understanding.
All manipulated biased translations with convenient additions and deletions cannot qualify to be God's words. Only what is spoken through the Holy Spirit qualify now to be called God' words!
And you are the one who decides what has been spoken through the Holy Spirit, eh?
All those who humble themselves and yield to the work of the Holy Spirit will understand the will of God. It is not decided by a group of people. It is the question of personal salvation and conviction based on the writings available.
Writings that you reject.
Are you aware of the history of canon that got started dubiously by Marcion who rejected all the OT and books and portions of books in the NT that contained the OT verses?
There are so many writings. Why many have been rejected and a few only selected differently by different groups?
I will just say this, and then we need to move on. If you think that because some council convened that they made that decision, then your image of God is that He is a weakling who is totally at the mercy of man. God really is in control, and the Bible really is HIS written word. It’s not mans written word, it’s God’s. He decides what goes in it, not you and not a counsel....and He decided that long ago.
Can you but imagine with no real knowledge of the awesomeness of it in truth, sitting at the feet of Yeshua himself as he teaches his Fathers words?Yes! And, beyond that, has anyone given thought to the question: Why were Jesus Christ's Words not preserved in more volume and detail? Surely, we have enough. But wouldn't it be nice to have more? God acts in mysterious ways!
Other than Luke (who received his Gospel "from above" (Gk anothen), meaning by Divine inspiration, Matthew, Mark, and John were all disciples, and two of them were apostles....ultimately recorded by others that weren't the actual disciples writing
Yes, and a lot of the added man made elements of modern Christianity are there to accommodate parishioners, and encourage their financial support.
I will just say this, and then we need to move on. If you think that because some council convened that they made that decision, then your image of God is that He is a weakling who is totally at the mercy of man. God really is in control, and the Bible really is HIS written word. It’s not mans written word, it’s God’s. He decides what goes in it, not you and not a counsel....and He decided that long ago.
This the conservative Christians forum is not, per the SOP = Statement of Purpose, the place for liberal Christianity to be argued.Are you aware of the history of canon that got started dubiously by Marcion who rejected all the OT and books and portions of books in the NT that contained the OT verses?
There are so many writings. Why many have been rejected and a few only selected differently by different groups?
This the conservative Christians forum is not, per the SOP = Statement of Purpose, the place for liberal Christianity to be argued.
Do you understand what that means? You're denying the scriptures as written, which is against the SOP for this particular forum.
STOP!
BYE!