Your comment is out of line too.Which "God"? The "God" that allegedly walked and talked in a garden that has no evidence of having existed, poofed people and animals into existence, and later, in a manner contrary to the modern understanding of genetics, populated the planet with a tiny group of individuals and animals that survived a global flood in an unbuildable boat, a flood that killed the dinosaurs in a manner that only *appears* to be 65 million years ago, because the Earth is really only somehow 6000 years old, yet remains, by every object measure to date indistinguishable from nothing?
I am comfortable in saying that that particular deity is only a character in a book. Not a "fact", as you would say.
Tell me, how does one gather an "accurate" view of Christianity?...
You don't understand Christians and hold a skewed view of Christianity as a whole.
"Refuse" implies intent. Belief is not a conscious choice.The flaw is in the misunderstanding of God's two-part plan of salvation, as it applies to the nature of all who are born into the physical world. Children are a gift from God. Sadly, some are refused, and yes, shame on those who refuse a gift from God. But, the truth of the word of God, is that all who are born into the world are born into sin and death, born dead, as it were. And, God is not the god of the dead, but of the living. In order to be among the [actual] living, one must also be born [again] of the spirit of God: which also is a gift. Sadly, some refuse this most precious gift...as well.
In the common vernacular, "dimension" is a measure of something, such as length, breadth, duration. What do you mean by that word?Hahaha...that is a good point. But not because it is correct, but because it shows this universe as NOT being a dimension. And if not a dimension...then what? You may have just come to the one card that brings the house down.
Only if you misrepresent what I said. Is that something that is beyond your control to stop?So apparently my "delusion" does matter to you?
Which Christian beliefs? The ones compatible with modern science, and the standard models of physics and cosmology? Or the ones that require virtually all of that to be wrong? I am still not sure what you believe. For example, how much of modern science has to be wrong for your beliefs to be right?Even though you just claimed it does not matter to you in the beginning of your post. What if Christian beliefs could solve all the problems in government and school systems?
Live as an apocalyptic preacher? Do you hate your mother and father? Have you given away or sold all of your possessions and given all of your money to the poor?What if the only reason their are problems is because people don't hold christian values, in other words people don't live like Christ lived.
You first.Notice I'm saying "what if", meaning I just want you to really think it through.
You are correct to say that refusal does not apply to belief. In my comment, it was a shortcut to the fact that refusing to acknowledge something as immense as the history of the world as told by eye witnesses from every generation of record...is a type of selective blindness bordering on refusal."Refuse" implies intent. Belief is not a conscious choice.
Anonymous second- and third-hand stories of stories told by eyewitnesses are of little use historically.You are correct to say that refusal does not apply to belief. In my comment, it was a shortcut to the fact that refusing to acknowledge something as immense as the history of the world as told by eye witnesses from every generation of record
According to a citation on wiki, an estimated 5 to 6 percent of the general population have been abducted by extraterrestrial aliens visiting Earth....is a type of selective blindness bordering on refusal.
Good of you to ask the abstract questions.In the common vernacular, "dimension" is a measure of something, such as length, breadth, duration. What do you mean by that word?
Not at all. You misrepresent what I have said. I simply asked for you to define a word as you had used it. Are you unable to do so?Good of you to ask the abstract questions.
If I read from a book, it is measurable by word count, but also by content. But if you deny the content is true, then the content to you, is immeasurable. And if the book can be proven non-existent by scientific means, in that matter is actually energy, then it too is also immeasurable.
So then, neither of us can say anything that can be substantiated...except within our own acceptable terms of context: in your case, common vernacular.
But then again, no man, is an island...in which case, you loose by default.
On these forums, the reality of God is considered a fact, not to be questioned, discounted, or attacked. Your comment is out of line.
That would of course violate your rule of common vernacular...and put everything you yourself have ever read or studied, in the same category.Anonymous second- and third-hand stories of stories told by eyewitnesses are of little use historically.
What precaution could one possibly take against something out of ones control? What precautions are you taking, for instance, about the potential of collisions of meteors colliding with the earth?According to a citation on wiki, an estimated 5 to 6 percent of the general population have been abducted by extraterrestrial aliens visiting Earth.
What precautions have you taken to prevent this from happening to you and your family? Nothing? Why would you refuse to take action against this?
Just so we understand the terms, are NOT "common vernacular." It is a foolish notion to give final say and authority to random human activity. So, I do not, and will not. It is also foolish to think that we can attain greater knowledge, within the lesser context of what is considered "common."Not at all. You misrepresent what I have said. I simply asked for you to define a word as you had used it. Are you unable to do so?
The answer would be comparable to the difference between quantity and quality. I will let you answer the question: What is the measure of the memory of your whole life...not the years, but the memories?In the common vernacular, "dimension" is a measure of something, such as length, breadth, duration. What do you mean by that word?
"It is finished." John 19:30 Thus, the Time argument...is void.
"It is finished." ...Is this registering with you ('cause it is not with most Christians, and requires some knowledge of science)?
It is basically special pleading; God can do whatever he wants. You know, stuff like; God is the first cause and everything needs a first cause, except God.
On these forums, the reality of God is considered a fact, not to be questioned, discounted, or attacked. Your comment is out of line.
Oh darn...you totally missed it! Stuck in the time context, I see.Oh yes, thank you for reminding me of the Jesus story. Since he was supposed to be '1/3 god' or 'god in one of 3 forms', or whatever nonsense one prefers, he of course would have very much been "inside time". After all, his entire story is one of existence in this world and his series of purported actions is chronicled in the Bible.This alone demolishes this puerile claim that god exists "outside time".
Oh yes, thank you for reminding me of the Jesus story. Since he was supposed to be '1/3 god' or 'god in one of 3 forms', or whatever nonsense one prefers, he of course would have very much been "inside time". After all, his entire story is one of existence in this world and his series of purported actions is chronicled in the Bible.This alone demolishes this puerile claim that god exists "outside time".