no, we have already been through this....if Jesus is God in the flesh, that is to say God, then God isn't setting anyone above Himself. If, as you say, Jesus isn't God, then in this passage, God is setting someone who isn't God equal to Himself even though we are told not to do that. So again, I ask the question you can't seem to answer...why would God put someone who isn't God equal to Himself when He tells us very clearly not to do such things? It's a simple question....just because you don't like the other version doesn't mean there isn't sense to it. You seem to keep missing that as well.
Look, I am trying to see this whole thing through your eyes, that is why I am asking questions. But you refuse or can't answer the questions asked of your version and the other version answers every single question and what is even more telling, it does so with logic, context, word study, and totality of scripture. Now, you have two choices at this point, you can either answer the questions and in answering them show logic, context, word study, totality of scripture or you can continue on as you are by ignoring all of this including the questions and show your ideas to be nothing more than a story that someone made up and convinced you of as being truth.
I am trying to understand...now, scripture is clear, so I am not going to change my mind, but I would like to have you convince me of your ideas, so that I can at least show a rational way of thinking it out. But you fail to present that rational line of thinking by refusing to answer the questions asked. Show me how this idea of yours fits, show me how to make sense out of God exalting a non God to the position of God even though He is adamantly opposed to that happening. IOW's pretend I can be convinced and show me...if I can find it in scripture I will change my mind just FYI, but since it isn't scriptural at least give me a reason to question trinity.