Evolution and the myth of "scientific consensus"

Status
Not open for further replies.

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,058
16,810
Dallas
✟871,701.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,058
16,810
Dallas
✟871,701.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Hmm. Are you equating this:

To this?

No. I'm stating exactly what I said I wish people would address exactly what I say instead of trying to add to what I say and then address what is a straw man. The assertion was that rivers have no purpose. I provided a purpose for rivers. If you want to argue with that, fell free to do so.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,670.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Which is your claim. One that you have yet to support.
I have no claim in this thread. The claim of an appearance of design is made by Dawkins.



I do not perceive organisms and their systems to appear to be designed for a purpose.
You do not hold the same position that biologists and other scientists hold then.
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,670.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No. I'm stating exactly what I said I wish people would address exactly what I say instead of trying to add to what I say and then address what is a straw man. The assertion was that rivers have no purpose. I provided a purpose for rivers. If you want to argue with that, fell free to do so.
I wish that you would address what I actually said rather than putting words into my mouth. I never asserted that rivers have no purpose.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
198
✟20,665.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I wish that you would address what I actually said rather than putting words into my mouth. I never asserted that rivers have no purpose.

They certainly try to turn to rivers and rocks instead of discussing creation and evolution.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.