justlookinla
Regular Member
You have never been able to point to one of those.
You'll keep trying to change the issue from humanity to rocks?
Upvote
0
You have never been able to point to one of those.
You'll keep trying to change the issue from humanity to rocks?
There are two options being discussed here, with those two options there are certain elements within each that are set..i.e in a materialistic view one must stay within how things are viewed with only materialistic known mechanisms and the other we must adhere to a supernatural view and what would be logical and cohesive within that view.If you want to play that game, we demand that you show us how the designer came about before we will accept any claims of something being designed. Or do you want to talk about the designer as if it just popped into existence as is?
There are two options being discussed here, with those two options there are certain elements within each that are set..i.e in a materialistic view one must stay within how things are viewed with only materialistic known mechanisms and the other we must adhere to a supernatural view and what would be logical and cohesive within that view.
Yet another post where you can't cite a single guess or supposition that is a part of the theory of evolution.
Really? They were created according to a plan?
Again, not a guess or a supposition that is part of the theory of evolution.
It's proven, by the scientific method, that tactile sensory units were created randomly?
It isn't a matter of logic and reason that is the issue.I can understand how logic and reason may seem different to you.
The theory of evolution neither guesses nor supposes that human hands were produced by random or planned processes.
That is your position, it is up to you to determine that and so far no one has given any evidence that provides confirmation that the design we see in nature is an illusion.Now, how would you show that something only appears designed?
That is your position,
Through evolution, as supported by evidence.
What methods? Just saying 'evolution' isn't describing the process of the creation of tactile sensory units.
It is your position as well, as it applies to things like ducks in clouds and faces on cliffs.
And here we go shying away from the creation of humanity.
We are still waiting for you to point out the guesses and suppositions that scientists are using. Still not seeing any.