Worship The Church?

tz620q

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2007
2,677
1,048
Carmel, IN
✟573,616.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You just told me that Jesus existed before Mary, making it impossible for her to be His Mother.. having a Mother implies a beginning, and He has NO BEGINNING, and NO END of days. Elizabeth is speaking of Mary as His Mother from His humanity standpoint.. not from an eternal one.. this should be obvious.

First, nothing is impossible with God. If God the Father chose Mary as the human mother of the human nature of God's Son, Jesus Christ, then does it not follow that Christ's fleshly body is from his mother and possesses her DNA? I think we agree upon this and can leave the details of how this was accomplished as a mystery. I am trying to drive a stake in the ground to show at least that we are thinking about something in common. That agreement is that Christ possessed an actual physical body, that this body was begotten of the Virgin Mary, that this body did actually experience human death and resurrection, and that this body ascended into Heaven, where it exists to this day. Would you agree?
 
Upvote 0

ThatTrueLight

John 1:9
Feb 12, 2015
2,091
52
✟2,579.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
First, nothing is impossible with God. If God the Father chose Mary as the human mother of the human nature of God's Son, Jesus Christ, then does it not follow that Christ's fleshly body is from his mother and possesses her DNA? I think we agree upon this and can leave the details of how this was accomplished as a mystery. I am trying to drive a stake in the ground to show at least that we are thinking about something in common. That agreement is that Christ possessed an actual physical body, that this body was begotten of the Virgin Mary, that this body did actually experience human death and resurrection, and that this body ascended into Heaven, where it exists to this day. Would you agree?

Not correct, it is impossible for God to lie.. as for the rest, you have no argument from me.. although at first you said that part of the Nicene Creed is to believe that Mary is God's Mother, and it's not.
 
Upvote 0

tz620q

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2007
2,677
1,048
Carmel, IN
✟573,616.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Not correct, it is impossible for God to lie.

What is not correct? Please explain what you do not agree with.

although at first you said that part of the Nicene Creed is to believe that Mary is God's Mother, and it's not.

I did not state it that way. Those are your words. I stated, "It (Christs' Body) possesses the true substance of God the Father and the true human DNA of Mary, the mother."
 
Upvote 0

ThatTrueLight

John 1:9
Feb 12, 2015
2,091
52
✟2,579.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What is not correct? Please explain what you do not agree with.

You said that all things are possible with God and yet we know that He can't lie, it's completely against His divine nature.

I did not state it that way. Those are your words. I stated, "It (Christs' Body) possesses the true substance of God the Father and the true human DNA of Mary, the mother."

Great, then it's not necessary to believe that Mary is God's Mother.. according to the Creed.
 
Upvote 0

wilts43

Newbie
May 22, 2011
236
79
✟21,547.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
From Wiki........
"The Council of Ephesus decreed in 431 that Mary is Theotokos because her son Jesus is both God and man: one Divine Person with two natures (Divine and human) intimately, hypostatically united …....."

why do you accept the Eucumenical council of Nicaea, but not of Ephesus?

.........."Within the Orthodox and Catholic tradition, Mother of God has not been understood, nor been intended to be understood, as referring to Mary as Mother of God from eternity — that is, as Mother of God the Father — but only with reference to the birth of Jesus, that is, the Incarnation. This limitation in the meaning of Mother of God must be understood by the person employing the term. To make it explicit, it is sometimes translated Mother of God Incarnate."

..... "most Christians believe God the Son is begotten of God the Father "from all eternity" (see Trinity and Nicene Creed), but is born "in time" of Mary.
Theotokos thus refers to the Incarnation, when the Second Person of the Holy Trinity took on human nature in addition to his pre-existing divine nature, this being made possible through the cooperation of Mary."


We are talking about revealed truth (concerning mysteries concerning the nature of God & man) within & without of time itself! This requires acceptance of divine revelation through God's Church.

You seem to be uncomfortable with the Church as a Divinely guided entity and as an authority?
But you accept Nicaea?.... but then not the Council of Ephesus (& holding Nestorian faith).
But on what authority do you select? I can't fathom it?

Nor can you escape from the problem of setting your own authority above those of apostolic councils?
Are you more nearly "infallible" in this judgement than than those Councils were?
You also seem uncomfortable with the great redemptive theme/typology/mystery.... of Mary as the new (real) Eve?
At the root of this thread is a reaction to Apostolic churches that put the Church as precedent to "The Bible".
You cannot escape the issue of authority.
You can only................
(1) Put the Bible on a pedastle. Then try to read the bible absolutely literally as its own "interpreter" (An impossible task). Bibliolatry.
(2)Accept the church as founded by Christ (and given all authority by him & The Holy Spirit) as your guide
(3)Set The Bible on a pedestal with yourself over it (and The Church) as interpreter!
 
Upvote 0

ThatTrueLight

John 1:9
Feb 12, 2015
2,091
52
✟2,579.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Another example of putting the bible down.. setting it on a pedestal... all sheer nonsense.

Men are born again by the word of God, and when they believe its content.. specifically that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, then God knowing the heart, seals that person with the Holy Spirit of promise unto the day of redemption.

Here's a perfect example of you might not be a Christian IF...

If you dis the word of God and tell others that they set it on a pedestal while at the same time worshiping your own assembly..

Hey, these two threads might be related.. :)
 
Upvote 0

ThatTrueLight

John 1:9
Feb 12, 2015
2,091
52
✟2,579.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Men are not born again by their church, or when a priest says some words and dunks them in water.. none of that makes a person see the kingdom of God.. the word of God does that.. and faith comes by hearing the word of God.

Once again, we're in ANYTHING BUT territory here.. because once again, it's typically anything but what God did say.
 
Upvote 0

wilts43

Newbie
May 22, 2011
236
79
✟21,547.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Another example of putting the bible down.. setting it on a pedestal... all sheer nonsense.

Men are born again by the word of God, and when they believe its content.. specifically that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, then God knowing the heart, seals that person with the Holy Spirit of promise unto the day of redemption.

Here's a perfect example of you might not be a Christian IF...

If you dis the word of God and tell others that they set it on a pedestal while at the same time worshiping your own assembly..

Hey, these two threads might be related.. :)

No-one is "diss' ing" the word of God.
Catholics & Orthodox may sometimes see it slightly differently, and in the context of the respect in which they hold the Church, which is Christ's handiwork.
The Church gave us The Bible.....as the selected works they discerned (in virtue of their guidance & authority) as "inspired".
It is impossible to "respect" the bible (as an entity) whilst dissing the church that composed it.
But we do not "worship" our church any more than you worship the bible.

Try this passage from John 6
52 Then the Jews started arguing among themselves, 'How can this man give us his flesh to eat?'

truth I tell you, if you do not eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.


person up on the last day.


55 For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink.


56 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood lives in me and I live in that person.


life from the Father, so whoever eats me will also draw life from me.


58 This is the bread which has come down from heaven; it is not like the bread our ancestors ate: they are dead, but anyone who eats this bread will live for ever.


59 This is what he taught at Capernaum in the synagogue.


60 After hearing it, many of his followers said, 'This is intolerable language. How could anyone accept it?'


61 Jesus was aware that his followers were complaining about it and said, 'Does this disturb you?"


----------------------------------------------
Do these words disturb you to?
The overwhelming majority of Christians have always believed them literally.
At the Reformation others were disturbed again and could not accept these words so clearly underlined by Christ here.
So, are those who believe these words "dissing" the word of God?
Hardly!
And those who cannot accept them? Are they the ones "respecting" Christ's words?



I think Tony Campolo is right.
Catholics & Orthodox focuss centrally upon The Gospels, and protestants upon the Pauline Epistles.

And understandably so. The Reformation started with Luther solving his existential angst through his work on Romans.
By placing the "faith alone" theme as the hingepin of everything else a necessary balance was lost. (cf James; Roms 2:5-11 & The Gospels description of judgement solely according to our treatment of the needy)

Moreover the Epistles are happenstantial survivals of letters to addresss particular issues, in particular places, as they arose. Context is everything.
The Gospels were written as definitive accounts of Christ's work & mission.

So we are not "worshipping our assemblies". Catholicism (& Orthodoxy) retains this balance between the living, breathing, authoritative community from Pentecost, and its "Word-of-God".

And this word of God has always been interpreted authoritatively by the church (As Paul was doing to a particular context in Romans). But these Apostolic Churches have also maintained a balance of focus.....not using this one phrase in Romans to "diss" other parts of scripture (Luther wanted to ditch James).

And men are "born again" when they act completely differently (Not when they have an emotional high).
When they give away all they have, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, they are "born again" ......now when we really do all that, & share this earth.....we can say "we have really, really been born again". we can then show our faith as James points out because then it is real.
 
Upvote 0

ThatTrueLight

John 1:9
Feb 12, 2015
2,091
52
✟2,579.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No-one is "diss' ing" the word of God.

That's exactly what you're all doing when you say ridiculous things like putting the bible on a pedestal.

It's the WORD of God.. if that means anything at all to you, and it's how every person has ever been sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, by believing its simple truth.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ThatTrueLight

John 1:9
Feb 12, 2015
2,091
52
✟2,579.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is the bread which has come down from heaven; it is not like the bread our ancestors ate: they are dead, but anyone who eats this bread will live for ever.
.

Here's a simple question.. Why are all who eat this bread dying? Every last one? The LORD says point blank that anyone who eats this bread will live for ever.

So why do those who eat this bread die?

Was the Lord mistaken? That's not really an option is it.. it's rhetorical.. but there can be no mistake in His words here.. that anyone who eats this bread will live for ever.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,561
12,110
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,179,025.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
You just told me that Jesus existed before Mary, making it impossible for her to be His Mother.. having a Mother implies a beginning, and He has NO BEGINNING, and NO END of days. Elizabeth is speaking of Mary as His Mother from His humanity standpoint.. not from an eternal one.. this should be obvious.
Mothers do not create their children or give them a beginning, God does that. What mothers do is carry the person God created by their own flesh in their womb, usually for 9 months, and then after giving birth they nurture them by feeding, cleaning, clothing and teaching them.
The only difference between Mary and our own mothers is that the person she did all the above with already existed from eternity. If you deny that Mary is the mother of God, then you implicitly deny that Jesus was truly man.
"Mother of God" was, is and always will be a christological title declaring that Jesus was fully God and fully man.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

wilts43

Newbie
May 22, 2011
236
79
✟21,547.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
That's exactly what you're all doing when you say ridiculous things like putting the bible on a pedestal.

It's the WORD of God.. if that means anything at all to you, and it's how every person has ever been sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, by believing its simple truth.

Did you read my whole post?

"The Word of God" (as the "The Bible"), cannot be seperated from the living church (established by Christ)........and that discerned its contents.
By "putting the bible on a pedastel" I refer to your accusation that some "worship their assemblies" (Put them on pedastels)
If you were used to "worshipping" the bible, you might view those who put it in its context (as a compilation of the Catholic Church) as "worshipping their assembly".
But it is simply more balanced.

I am trying to suggest the Aposotolic Churches position is not only more biblical, but the exegesis is more balanced, (without subjugating everything to Luther's hingepin from Romans). It is also historically correct.

As to your "believing its simple truth" ......you go on to claim a passage is "rhetorical". How do you know?
This is what I was trying to say about Luther making Romans the hingepin of everything.....and actually "dissing" other parts of the Bible.....Thus he calls James "An epistle of straw".

It's this paring down the Bible to a simple slogan ("Faith alone") that leads to dissing other parts that qualify that simplicity. So faith is reduced to a warm feeling of reassurance, freed of suffering and the abolutely vital duty to serve the needy.
 
Upvote 0

ThatTrueLight

John 1:9
Feb 12, 2015
2,091
52
✟2,579.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Did you read my whole post?

"The Word of God" (as the "The Bible"), cannot be seperated from the living church (established by Christ)........and that discerned its contents.

Right, only the men in your assembly can discern its content.

Got it.
 
Upvote 0

wilts43

Newbie
May 22, 2011
236
79
✟21,547.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Right, only the men in your assembly can discern its content.

Got it.

I said, referring to The Catholic Church & The Bible,...... "and that discerned its contents". (there was an S)

It is an historical fact that it was the catholic bishops, at the Councils of Carthage (397 & 419AD) & Rome (382A), that "canonized" a selection of scripture.
This was "The Bible" for all christians for over a Millenium.
(Previous to that, various other scriptures were asserted to be inspired.)

But "The Bible" was settled......only the authority of The Catholic Bishops.
This stood for over 1000 years.

Luther thought he knew better and chucked out some books 1100 hundred years later. He also wanted to get rid of James but wiser councils prevailed.

The question is how do you know which documents should be in your library (bible) of God's words (words about God)?.........

(1)Do you accept The Catholic bishops selection? (Their authority from Christ is scriptural)
(2)Or do you "prefer" Luther's? (Where does he get the authority for this?)
(3)Or have you made your own selection?

Here are some you could assess for yourself
The Infancy Gospel of Thomas [Greek Text A]
The Infancy Gospel of Thomas [Greek Text B]
The Infancy Gospel of Thomas [Latin Text]
A 5th Century Compilation of the Thomas Texts
An Arabic Infancy Gospel
The Gospel of James
The Gospel of the Nativity of Mary
The Gospel of Mary [Magdalene]
The Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew
The Gospel of Nicodemus [Acts of Pilate]
The Gospel of Bartholomew
The Gospel of Peter
The Gospel of Thomas
The Gospel of Philip
The Gospel of the Lord [by Marcion]
The Secret Gospel of Mark
The Gospel of Judas

The Acts of Andrew
The Acts and Martyrdom of Andrew
The Acts of Andrew and Matthew
The Acts of Barnabas
Martyrdom of Bartholomew
The Acts of John
The Mystery of the Cross-Excerpt from the Acts of John
The Acts of John the Theologian
The History of Joseph the Carpenter
The Book of John Concerning the Death of Mary
The Passing of Mary
The Acts and Martyrdom of Matthew
The Martyrdom of Matthew
The Acts of Paul
The Acts of Paul and Thecla
The Acts of Peter
The Acts of Peter and Andrew
The Acts of Peter and Paul
The Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles
The Acts of Philip
The Report of Pontius Pilate to Tiberius
The Giving Up of Pontius Pilate
The Death of Pilate
The Acts of Thaddaeus
The Acts of Thomas
The Book of Thomas the Contender
The Consummation of Thomas
 
  • Like
Reactions: tadoflamb
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Or when He says that YE ARE that one bread.. it's true.. we ARE His FLESH and His BONES.. and so we don't EAT ourselves.. we break bread with HIM at His table.

We don't EAT Him at His table.

It's amazing I would even need to write that.. but here I am.. looking like the crazy one.. LOL
Are you the guy who yanks security blankets away from 3yr olds?
;)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ThatTrueLight

John 1:9
Feb 12, 2015
2,091
52
✟2,579.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I said, referring to The Catholic Church & The Bible,...... "and that discerned its contents". (there was an S)

It is an historical fact that it was the catholic bishops, at the Councils of Carthage (397 & 419AD) & Rome (382A), that "canonized" a selection of scripture.
This was "The Bible" for all christians for over a Millenium.
(Previous to that, various other scriptures were asserted to be inspired.)

But "The Bible" was settled......only the authority of The Catholic Bishops.
This stood for over 1000 years.

Luther thought he knew better and chucked out some books 1100 hundred years later. He also wanted to get rid of James but wiser councils prevailed.

The question is how do you know which documents should be in your library (bible) of God's words (words about God)?.........

(1)Do you accept The Catholic bishops selection? (Their authority from Christ is scriptural)
(2)Or do you "prefer" Luther's? (Where does he get the authority for this?)
(3)Or have you made your own selection?

Here are some you could assess for yourself
The Infancy Gospel of Thomas [Greek Text A]
The Infancy Gospel of Thomas [Greek Text B]
The Infancy Gospel of Thomas [Latin Text]
A 5th Century Compilation of the Thomas Texts
An Arabic Infancy Gospel
The Gospel of James
The Gospel of the Nativity of Mary
The Gospel of Mary [Magdalene]
The Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew
The Gospel of Nicodemus [Acts of Pilate]
The Gospel of Bartholomew
The Gospel of Peter
The Gospel of Thomas
The Gospel of Philip
The Gospel of the Lord [by Marcion]
The Secret Gospel of Mark
The Gospel of Judas

The Acts of Andrew
The Acts and Martyrdom of Andrew
The Acts of Andrew and Matthew
The Acts of Barnabas
Martyrdom of Bartholomew
The Acts of John
The Mystery of the Cross-Excerpt from the Acts of John
The Acts of John the Theologian
The History of Joseph the Carpenter
The Book of John Concerning the Death of Mary
The Passing of Mary
The Acts and Martyrdom of Matthew
The Martyrdom of Matthew
The Acts of Paul
The Acts of Paul and Thecla
The Acts of Peter
The Acts of Peter and Andrew
The Acts of Peter and Paul
The Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles
The Acts of Philip
The Report of Pontius Pilate to Tiberius
The Giving Up of Pontius Pilate
The Death of Pilate
The Acts of Thaddaeus
The Acts of Thomas
The Book of Thomas the Contender
The Consummation of Thomas

Can there be a better example of 'church' worship than this right here?
 
Upvote 0