What happens in a divorce?

Messy

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2011
10,027
2,082
Holland
✟21,082.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Can you give me an example of irreconcialable differences?
some mental ilnesses, abuse, one doesn't want sex ever, one is addicted to inappropriate content and doesn't want help, things like that or adultery. It is possible to fix such a marriage if both want to and if you get real good help.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Well, jesus said sexual immorality when he talked about divorce. This can include adultery but theres other ways of being sexual immoral. Like the person could be absuing their spouse sexually, like raping them. In the marriage or getting them to do things they dont wanna do in bed.
That is NOT what He said. He was NOT speaking English; probably either Aramaic or a dialect of Hebrew. It came down to us in Koine Greek where the word is "inappropriate contentia." More than likely He used the word "ervah" which is from Deut 24.1 and is often rendered "indecency" or "uncleanness."

Actually, the sages of the day (or prevous generation) argued over what it meant. Shammai said it meant that the husband found his wife to not be a virgin on their wedding night. Hillel (grandfather of Paul's mentor Gameliel) said if she continually burned his meals. (i.e. "any reason") When the Pharisees asked that using the term "any reason" it shows the debate was still going on between their respective followers.

Jesus could NEVER teach contrary to the Law of Moses. As a Jewish male, to do so would have been a sin worthy of death. So his teachings had to absolutely uphold Deut 24.1.

As to "other ways" of being immoral - of course there are. Including having sex during menses. Or shortly after giving birth.
 
Upvote 0

Goodbook

Reading the Bible
Jan 22, 2011
22,090
5,106
New Zealand
Visit site
✟78,875.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
With mental illness can you give me an example. I know some are very hard to handle but there is always help for that.

With inappropriate content, someone who doesnt want sex ever, maybe they gay or something. Yes thats a problem. Married couples should be married and be having relations with each other, not the tv, a magazine, or someone of the same sex. Or someone outside of it.
 
Upvote 0

Messy

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2011
10,027
2,082
Holland
✟21,082.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
With mental illness can you give me an example. I know some are very hard to handle but there is always help for that.

With inappropriate content, someone who doesnt want sex ever, maybe they gay or something. Yes thats a problem. Married couples should be married and be having relations with each other, not the tv, a magazine, or someone of the same sex. Or someone outside of it.
Borderline, I know a guy, his ex who had that threatened him with two knifes, a man on cf, his wife throws him around the house if he doesn't clean up, another one has one with OCD who is abusive and doesn't want help.
 
Upvote 0

Goodbook

Reading the Bible
Jan 22, 2011
22,090
5,106
New Zealand
Visit site
✟78,875.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Oh no! Yes be very difficult to be married to someone who thinks they want to kill you. They might not have known this when got married though.

Other mental illnesses i think can be coped with. Like some people prone to depression. Which seems to be classified as a mental illness. But that doesnt mean they dont love you.
 
Upvote 0

Goodbook

Reading the Bible
Jan 22, 2011
22,090
5,106
New Zealand
Visit site
✟78,875.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
And of course God wouldnt want us to be married to a psychopath or a pimp. That wouldnt be marriage, be bondage. Some might try and trick you into marrying though, which is why its not a good idea to marry so young. To someone you barely know.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Mister_Al

Regular Member
Jun 9, 2005
1,004
161
✟9,656.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That is NOT what He said. He was NOT speaking English; probably either Aramaic or a dialect of Hebrew. It came down to us in Koine Greek where the word is "inappropriate contentia." More than likely He used the word "ervah" which is from Deut 24.1 and is often rendered "indecency" or "uncleanness."

Actually, the sages of the day (or prevous generation) argued over what it meant. Shammai said it meant that the husband found his wife to not be a virgin on their wedding night. Hillel (grandfather of Paul's mentor Gameliel) said if she continually burned his meals. (i.e. "any reason") When the Pharisees asked that using the term "any reason" it shows the debate was still going on between their respective followers.

Jesus could NEVER teach contrary to the Law of Moses. As a Jewish male, to do so would have been a sin worthy of death. So his teachings had to absolutely uphold Deut 24.1.

As to "other ways" of being immoral - of course there are. Including having sex during menses. Or shortly after giving birth.

You say that is not what Jesus Said. Well, then what DID Jesus say? In every scripture I found in the Bible where Jesus talks about divorce He says sexual immorality. How can you say "more than likely" he used a certain word without offering up scripture from the Bible, or other accepted source, to show what He 'could have' said.

The Bible has been around for over a millennial and has plenty enough time, and scrutiny, for any erroneously translated words to have been corrected by now.


Matthew 19:8-9 KJV

8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your
wives: but from the beginning it was not so. 9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery .


The scripture above proves that Jesus could, and did, contradict the Law of Moses by correcting it and explaining His correction by stating "and I say unto you," which means that what He was saying was all that was needed to know.

Please don't think I'm picking on anybody, but we have a lot of questionable doctrines floating around today by well meaning people that are based on the premise that something else was 'meant' in the Bible because somebody couldn't possibly have said/done something that they did say/do.

I'm open to learning everything I can from the Bible that is of sound doctrine from anybody, but I'd like it to be presented in the light of authoritative documentation.

Blessings,

Alan
 
Upvote 0

Messy

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2011
10,027
2,082
Holland
✟21,082.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You say that is not what Jesus Said. Well, then what DID Jesus say? In every scripture I found in the Bible where Jesus talks about divorce He says sexual immorality. How can you say "more than likely" he used a certain word without offering up scripture from the Bible, or other accepted source, to show what He 'could have' said.

The Bible has been around for over a millennial and has plenty enough time, and scrutiny, for any erroneously translated words to have been corrected by now.


Matthew 19:8-9 KJV

8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your
wives: but from the beginning it was not so. 9 And I say unto you"and I say unto you., Whosoever shall put away his
wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery : and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery .


The scripture above proves that Jesus could, and did, contradict the Law of Moses by correcting it and explaining His correction by stating "and I say unto you," which means that what He was saying was all that was needed to know.

Please don't think I'm picking on anybody, but we have a lot of questionable doctrines floating around today by well meaning people that are based on the premise that something else was 'meant' in the Bible because somebody couldn't possibly have said/done something that they did say/do.

I'm open to learning everything I can from the Bible that is of sound doctrine from anybody, but I'd like it to be presented in the light of authoritative documentation.

Blessings,

Alan
I saw a great explanation from a man who knew a girl who was married to an abusive agressive man and she wanted to divorce but the elders said she should stay and then he shot and killed her. In the O.T. you could divorce if you didn't get the basics he said, food, love and clothes or something and Jesus didn't say that didn't count anymore, He just answered the question that you could divorce when she wasn't a virgin or with something unclean and not just for any reason. So with abuse they were protected.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums