- Jul 2, 2005
- 15,666
- 2,957
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
You are something else. You were the one who brought up the geberah.
You challenged me, I answered you, don't make it like I am going off on tangents. You wanted to know what I was going to do with that, I answered that King David never had a Queen Mother sit on the throne, and Yeshua is to sit on Davids throne, not Solomon's. So what are you going to do with that? Come up with something on the topic without casting aspersions at me.
You really aren't getting this. Forget it. Too weird.
David's throne is now occupied by the Messiah. Not by David. Every person, including David and all of his successors had mothers. In Jewish royal families, they were called "Gebirah". In English, that's "Queen Mother". They weren't necessarily advisers nor were they necessarily used as "go-betweens" (which apparently you have a problem with- awfully patriarchal of you I might add) So, assuming that the Messiah is human (you still believe that, don't you? Or is that up for grabs this week too?) and had a human mother, that would make humble Mary the Queen Mother to the King Messiah. What are you going to do with that? You either a) keep arguing as if that changes the facts, b) keep in Jewish thought and say "ok, fine by me" or c) continue to dodge the fact and hate on the RCs for believing the simple fact.
You see, you just come across as hating the Catholics. You appear as if don't want to accept Bible truths because you are afraid you might end up with something in common with them. To me, that's weird. I can agree with the Bible and not draw the conclusion that Mary is some kind of intercessor or adviser to God. You can't because you will have to admit that the "dumb Christians" might have actually got something more Jewish than your anti-Catholic teachers have. Scary, huh?
Real simple. No need to muddy this any further.
Last edited:
Upvote
0