How can you say someone or something is un-Christian when you cannot even provide a valid scriptural definition of Christian.
Generalize much?
I do not know much about Arians but the little I do know sounds like they are on the right track. They are much closer to the Truth than Nicene.
Really? Denying the divinity of Christ is closer to the truth than Trinitarianism?
Really?
I've guess you've never heard of [in no particular order] John 8:58, John 10:25-30, John 20:29, Colossians 2:8-10, Hebrews 1:8-9, Philippians 2:10-11 [compared with Isaiah 45:22], Acts 20:28, Titus 2:13, 2 Peter 1:1, John 1:1-18, Philippians 2:5-7, Colossians 1:15-17, 1 Timothy 3:16, Isaiah 9:6, Revelation 1:8, Revelation 1:17-18, Revelation 2:8, Revelation 22:12-13, Hebrews 13:8, John 21:17, Matthew 28:20, Colossians 1:16, Hebrews 1:3, Acts 3:15, and Hebrews 2:14, among others.
The concept of the Trinity is obviously false on the face of it. It is certainly un-scriptural.
Give me scripture denying it. I've given you just a few of those passages affirming it.
The Plan of Salvation makes a lot more sense than anything I have ever heard of by any 'Christian'.
Ah yes, because in the beginning, we existed as conscious pieces of energy floating through the cosmos. Then a flesh and blood god saw us, and feeling bad for us, decided that as we had no progression, we were damned. This flesh and blood god, it should be noted, was once a piece of conscious energy once long ago, who had been transformed by another flesh and blood god, who had once been a piece of conscious energy long ago, &c., and had been raised on a planet, with his own god, and his own savior. Then this flesh and blood god and his wife had sex, and we were born as spirit children, our conscious pieces of energy transformed into bodies of spirit matter. Matter much like ours, but more translucent. However, as we were not flesh and blood, per se, we could not experience the fullness of joy. So this flesh and blood god, who is not all powerful or all knowing, decided to create a planet out of existing matter (matter is eternal, so you, me, the material forming the computer in front of you, &c., is as old as "god" is). However, the question soon became how we were going to advance and return to our flesh and blood god. One of our spirit brothers, Lucifer, decided that he wanted to take away our agency (free will), and make us all return to our flesh and blood "god" in exchange for "god's" power. Then our eldest spirit brother, Jesus, said "thy will be done, I will offer myself as sacrifice." Our flesh and blood "god" liked this, but 1/3 of our spirit brethren did not, so they joined up with lucifer and were cast down to earth without bodies. In the future they will be cast into the outer darkness. This is the "first estate."
Then on earth our memories were wiped and we were given complete free will. Jesus came, BoM occurred, &c., and the LDS was founded. This is the "second estate." People died, went to the spirit prison/spirit paradise and were proselytized, and some became LDS through proxy work in temples (which are modems peeking through the "veil" into the hereafter). Then the resurrection occurrs, and the terrible people are sent to the telestial kingdom (whose glory, mind you, is so great that according to Joseph Smith, Jr., we would kill ourselves to get to it), the mediocre people are sent to the terrestrial kingdom, and the good LDS members are sent to the celestial kingdom, which is again divided into thirds. I'm excluding discussion of the sons of perdition and outer darkness for sake of brevity. The top third has the potential to eternally progress, and become flesh and blood "gods" like our flesh and blood "god" and repeat the cycle all over again.
I am not sure what problem you have with the Eternal nature of Christ.
Well, if everyone has an Eternal nature, like Christ, then what's so special about God?