I noticed that you ignored this little 'prediction' of your idea.
Prediction is in quotes because your idea is scientifically useless since it has no mathematics or numbers behind it and makes no real predictions!
ETA: This needs more explanation.
Michael's idea is basically Oliver Manual's insanely wrong idea (
Michael's site: Dr. Oliver Manuel was wrong!), i.e. the Sun sorts plasma into layers by atomic mass + the Sun is powered by a neutron star.
Michael removed the neutron star.
Michael removed the power source of the Sun !
Michael places all of the hydrogen in the Sun on the outside of the Sun. So there can be no fusion of hydrogen powering the Sun. But we detect the neutrinos from that fusion.
Michael's idea includes that within his imaginary solid iron surface are layers of even heavier elements, e.g. cobalt, osmium, gold, lead, etc. According to his logic, these will be solid (otherwise they would melt his imaginary solid iron surface). For example cobalt has a boiling point of 3200 K. So if these layers fill up the Sun then its mass will be much greater than 1 solar mass.
Thus the Sun is hollow.
According to his fantasies though these layers will be plasma and his imaginary solid iron surface will magically remain solid. In that case
Michael needs to support his idea by calculating the mass of the Sun. This will be a bit of a problem for
Michael since his idea is scientifically useless (not even a hypothesis!). The big problem that for
Michael will be explaining how there is plasma without a central power source.