ZIMMERMAN CHARGED!? Tune in @ 6:00pm EST News

Status
Not open for further replies.
L

Lovely Lane

Guest
You recall my statements incorrectly. What I had stated numerous times was that given currently released evidence that I could not see a rightful or lawful charge because of the lack of probable cause. Does that ring a bell?

I also stated numerous times that the SAO has all the evidence and has a more complete picture of the event and thus anything we could say about the case beyond what evidence was released was in fact, speculation. Starting to sound familiar now?

Again, your definition of stalking is not relevant as we are speaking of law. Thus a legal definition is the only proper one.

Also, you failed to answer my questions and yet again speculated regarding Zimmerman's actions if he had not had a firearm.
tis tis. Same old legal advise without a license to practice law. How does it feel to know so much law and never prosecuted a case? ^_^

You were wrong months ago, and you're wrong today, tis tis.
 
Upvote 0

TheChristianSurvivalGuide

Preparedness is Stewardship
May 29, 2010
1,442
38
Florida
Visit site
✟9,328.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
tis tis. Same old legal advise without a license to practice law. How does it feel to know so much law and never prosecuted a case? ^_^

You were wrong months ago, and you're wrong today, tis tis.

It is not advisement at all and no person reading these posts should ever assume any statement made by myself or any other poster is legal advise.

I'm a bit curious as to how you perceive my statements to be "advise" when I did not state what any person should do. Please articulate.

I also noticed that you still haven't answered my questions.
 
Upvote 0
L

Lovely Lane

Guest
It is not advisement at all and no person reading these posts should ever assume any statement made by myself or any other poster is legal advise.

I'm a bit curious as to how you perceive my statements to be "advise" when I did not state what any person should do. Please articulate.

I also noticed that you still haven't answered my questions.
keep waiting, hold your breath and hop on one leg.
 
Upvote 0

RaiseTheDead

Newbie
Jul 15, 2012
791
19
✟1,035.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Say someone breaks into your home; you fight them, gaining the upper hand and start smashing their head on the ground, but then they pull out a gun and kill you. Would you have been in the wrong because you were smashing their head on the ground? Of course not.

Similarly, martin was within his rights to defend himself when zimmerman was stalking him. Zimmerman was the aggressor by following martin for no legit reason.

This has no bearing on what happened. Zip. Nada.
 
Upvote 0

RaiseTheDead

Newbie
Jul 15, 2012
791
19
✟1,035.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Stalking comes in different forms, one has a legal definition the other hasn't.

IOW some choose to be belligerent about making stuff up, and that's peachy?

Zimmerman stalked Martin for blocks because he was a black kid in a hoody.
Zimmerman killed Martin, Zimmerman lies, Zimmerman has a history of playing busybody with a twist of wanting to be a hero. If it were not for concealed pistol in his pants Zimmerman would have stayed in the truck.

100% pure, unadulterated speculation. At least you're consistent!
 
Upvote 0
L

Lovely Lane

Guest
IOW some choose to be belligerent about making stuff up, and that's peachy?



100% pure, unadulterated speculation. At least you're consistent!
thank you. We'll see how this plays out. Many here said Zimmerman wouldn't be arrested, and here we are waiting for the trial to begin. I wonder is how many years will he get for killing Martin.
 
Upvote 0

TheChristianSurvivalGuide

Preparedness is Stewardship
May 29, 2010
1,442
38
Florida
Visit site
✟9,328.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
tis tis. Same old legal advise without a license to practice law. How does it feel to know so much law and never prosecuted a case? ^_^

You were wrong months ago, and you're wrong today, tis tis.

Ok, since you will not answer my previous questions I'll come back to this post.

You stated that I am wrong about something. What am I wrong about?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

TheChristianSurvivalGuide

Preparedness is Stewardship
May 29, 2010
1,442
38
Florida
Visit site
✟9,328.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I see your posts, that I acknowledge. There is nothing I care to speak to you about.

There may be nothing you want to converse with me about but ironically there are plenty of instances where you feel it necessary to make commentary regarding my posts. You certainly make plenty of claims regarding my opinions but yet when questioned or asked for articulation suddenly you are not willing to justify your previous comments.

So by your statement am I to assume that you are only interested in dictation and not conversation?
 
Upvote 0
L

Lovely Lane

Guest
There may be nothing you want to converse with me about but ironically there are plenty of instances where you feel it necessary to make commentary regarding my posts. You certainly make plenty of claims regarding my opinions but yet when questioned or asked for articulation suddenly you are not willing to justify your previous comments.

So by your statement am I to assume that you are only interested in dictation and not conversation?
I'm not fully interested in your self-righteous professional claim to know all of Martin case when you were way off the mark months ago.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hammster

Psalm 144:1
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,012
25,179
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,718,556.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
MOD HAT ON

After review by staff, this thread will remain closed. It's much easier to do than issue warnings for all the flaming and bickering.

Political discussions will be escalated this time of year. If you wish to stick around to defend your views, please keep in mind that it doesn't take much to be banned. So keep it civil.


MOD HAT OFF
 
  • Like
Reactions: brinny
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.