Home | Be a Christian | Devotionals | Join Us! | Forums | Rules | F.A.Q.


Go Back   Christian Forums > Blogs
Register BlogsPrayersJobsArcade Calendar Mark Forums Read

Old

The mock trial of the resurrection of Christ (part 5)

Posted 3rd May 2009 at 08:19 PM by Stinker
Updated 4th May 2009 at 10:00 PM by Stinker
Judge: "We are nearing the end of this investigation as to whether the resurrection of Jesus was a historical fact or not and whether it should be taught as a part of history." "Council for the Plaintiff you have the floor."

Council for the Plaintiff: "Thank you your honor." "In his last speech, council for the Defense inferred that the Christian religion was a cult. This is not true. A cult is a religion whose teachings are different from the mainstream...
Stinker's Avatar
Senior Veteran
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments 0 Stinker is offline
Old

The mock trial of the resurrection of Christ (part 4)

Posted 3rd May 2009 at 05:28 PM by Stinker
Updated 3rd May 2009 at 06:53 PM by Stinker
Judge: "Council of the Defense, you may present the first of your closing. "
Council for the Defense: "Thank you your honor."
"We know that all the historical evidence presented by Plaintiff's coucil is very solid circumstantial evidence. This is all that is needed to prove that many people in the mid 1st century believed that Jesus was bodily resurrected. Now let us let us examine why that evidence, though it be true, is not valid in proving that Jesus was...
Stinker's Avatar
Senior Veteran
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments 0 Stinker is offline
Old

The mock trial of the resurrection of Christ (page 3)

Posted 21st April 2009 at 10:30 PM by Stinker
Attorney for the Plaintiff: "Objection your honor." The council for the defense neglects the ancient Jewish understanding of how the first three days apply to the body of the deceased."

Judge: "Please enlighten us." "Afterwhich I will determine if I should over rule or sustain your motion."

Attorney for the Plaintiff: "Thank you your honor."

Attorney for the Plantiff: "Council for the Defense neglects...
Stinker's Avatar
Senior Veteran
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments 1 Stinker is offline
Old

The mock court trial of the historical resurrection of Christ

Posted 18th April 2009 at 09:48 PM by Stinker
Updated 20th April 2009 at 08:40 PM by Stinker
JUDGE: “Docket number…..’The Resurrection of Jesus Christ vs the AC_U’ will now come to order.” “Plaintiff maintains that the resurrection of Jesus Christ is supported by valid historical evidence and should therefore be taught as a literal fact. Defendant maintains that the Resurrection is not supported by secular historians and is therefore an ancient myth that should not be taught as a historical fact.”
“Attorney for the Plantiff, you may state your case.”
“Thank you your honor.”...
Stinker's Avatar
Senior Veteran
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments 0 Stinker is offline
Old

The Bible and the 'homosexual/transgender question

Posted 8th March 2009 at 04:45 PM by Stinker
Probably there is no other subject that generates more thread participation than this one. Many are convinced that since anal intercourse between males is prohibited in the Law of Moses, it must be so today because God sees it as an immoral act. There are other acts prohibited in the Law of Moses because they too are immoral. What some that are left out (sex between uncles and nieces) and (sex beween women) are supposedly 'caught in the net' of inclusion. Meaning that just because they...
Stinker's Avatar
Senior Veteran
Posted in Uncategorized
Comments 0 Stinker is offline
 
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.