That's the problem. Candidates have lots of marketing research, showing that people who don't think rigorously are much easier to program to fear and hate. And they know that such people are both easier to control and harder to disabuse of their fears and hatred.The bible belt states will ban that course.
Don't watch any kind of reality TV, or reels.IQ scores among Americans are falling. The evidence seems to be that it is due to environmental changes, possibly due to social media consumption and screen time:
I draw the line at the old “fixit” shows The Woodwright’s Shop with Roy Underhill, (even the host‘s name is “earthy”!)Don't watch any kind of reality TV, or reels.
They *replace* learning.
Texas?That's the problem. Candidates have lots of marketing research, showing that people who don't think rigorously are much easier to program to fear and hate. And they know that such people are both easier to control and harder to disabuse of their fears and hatred.
Listening to television political ads in Texas, one hears so much that is apparently aimed at angering people of very low intelligence by feeding them absurd stories. Apparently it works, or candidates wouldn't be using it. It's not just the far-right anymore; I see it happening with moderates and liberals as well.
That’s actually humor... Made me laugh.Texas?
IQ scores among Americans are falling. The evidence seems to be that it is due to environmental changes, possibly due to social media consumption and screen time:
That stuff is for real. But then as Sheriff J.B. Smith once noted, the good thing about criminals is they usually aren't very smart.That’s actually humor... Made me laugh.
Intelligence is a very flexible thing. The sort of cognitive abilities that would have served you well in 1900 are probably not the same as those that work well today. Technology alone has changed the sorts of cognitive skills required to succeed. And it's probably made some cognitive skills less important.I'm finding this hard to believe. Whenever I'm talking to an American in face-to-face conversions, I think they're getting smarter over the years. For me, being quite spontaneous in live conversations points to good IQ because they can process information and express themselves comprehensively quickly. And they're making more money than ever and the products far more sophisticated than the years past.
So I don't get it. Maybe their intelligence is extremely specialized? For the lack of good choice of words, dumb and unable to make sound reasoning outside their professional fields?
It’s mostly the dumb ones that get caught.That stuff is for real. But then as Sheriff J.B. Smith once noted, the good thing about criminals is they usually aren't very smart.
So Mr. Lawyer knows his customer base.
It’s mostly the dumb ones that get caught.
Intelligence is a very flexible thing. The sort of cognitive abilities that would have served you well in 1900 are probably not the same as those that work well today. Technology alone has changed the sorts of cognitive skills required to succeed. And it's probably made some cognitive skills less important.
The standard test has remained pretty much the same. That's how we know how people scored decades ago, relative to people today. But your impression of the emphasis on the test is pretty much spot on.What's being tested is still quite relevant today especially in the tech and finance fields. What made the difference is how quickly you answered the test. How fast you think seems fundamental to modern IQ tests.
Or maybe the modern IQ tests are biased towards people can work efficiently and fast and not about people who can ponder our place in the universe or root out the fundamental problems in society.
and gamesOur attention is constantly scattered and we can hardly focus on challenging things, or anything really, in a sustained way.
Thanks, internet / phones / social media.
The standard test has remained pretty much the same. That's how we know how people scored decades ago, relative to people today. But your impression of the emphasis on the test is pretty much spot on.
Einstein was no great success as a student in school, either. His genius was in his "Gedankenexperiment" where in he considered the physical implications of what the math was telling him. Imagination counts.Estimated IQ of Vincent Van Gogh goes up to 200 making him way smarter than Albert Einstein.
But if Vincent took modern IQ tests (where the test questions are already relevant in his time period), I doubt he's going to make it past 100.